The Gandhian Approach to Social Movements

The Gandhian approach, inspired by Mahatma Gandhi’s philosophy of Satyagraha, is grounded in the belief that social change should be achieved through non-violent means. Gandhi’s ideas were central to the Indian independence struggle, but they have influenced many global movements that advocate for peaceful resistance to injustice.

Core Features of the Gandhian Approach:

Non-Violence (Ahimsa): Gandhi strongly believed that non-violence is the highest form of social action. For him, violence not only undermines the moral fabric of society but also harms the perpetrator. This concept is foundational in the Gandhian approach to social movements.
Moral and Ethical Transformation: Gandhi’s approach emphasized the need for personal and societal moral transformation. He argued that true social change could only be achieved if individuals first transform their hearts and minds, purging themselves of hatred, selfishness, and materialism.
Self-Reliance (Swadeshi): Gandhi promoted the idea of self-reliance, advocating for local production and consumption, particularly through the famous Swadeshi movement. This emphasis on self-sufficiency is key to Gandhian social movements, where economic and social justice are seen as intertwined.
Mass Mobilization: Gandhi believed that true social change could not be achieved by elites alone but required the involvement of the masses, especially the marginalized. He used non-violent mass mobilization, such as boycotts, marches, and fasting, to garner support for causes like independence, equality, and social justice.

Strengths of the Gandhian Approach:

Moral Authority: The Gandhian approach has a strong moral component, which can inspire individuals to act from a place of ethical conviction, rather than material or political gain.
Inclusivity: Gandhi’s methods were inclusive, emphasizing unity across caste, religion, and social class. His approach sought to uplift the poorest and most oppressed in society.
Global Influence: The Gandhian approach influenced several global social movements, such as the Civil Rights Movement in the United States, led by Martin Luther King Jr., and anti-apartheid movements in South Africa, led by Nelson Mandela.

However, critics argue that the Gandhian approach, while morally compelling, may not always be practical in the face of systemic oppression or state violence. The strategy of non-violence can sometimes be seen as too passive or insufficient in the face of aggressive adversaries.

2. The Liberal Approach to Social Movements

The Liberal approach to social movements is rooted in liberal political theory, which prioritizes individual rights, democracy, and the protection of freedoms within established political systems. This approach is often employed to study movements in democratic societies where citizens seek to influence or change policies, laws, or norms in alignment with liberal democratic values.

Core Features of the Liberal Approach:

Focus on Rights and Freedoms: Liberal theorists view social movements primarily as mechanisms for securing individual rights and freedoms. They argue that movements are necessary when individuals or groups are denied their fundamental rights, such as the right to equality, freedom of speech, or political participation.
Institutional Engagement: Unlike the Gandhian approach, which often challenges the existing political order, the Liberal approach tends to work within institutional frameworks. Social movements, in this view, seek to reform existing laws or policies rather than dismantling them altogether.
Emphasis on Legal and Political Change: Liberal movements are often concerned with achieving legal reforms, such as civil rights legislation, gender equality laws, or labor protections. The success of a movement, from this perspective, is often measured by how effectively it brings about institutional change.
Individual Autonomy: A key feature of the Liberal approach is the belief in individual autonomy and freedom. Liberal social movements advocate for the removal of barriers that restrict individual liberty, whether based on class, gender, or ethnicity. This approach tends to prioritize individual empowerment over collective identity.

Strengths of the Liberal Approach:

Pragmatic and Reformist: The Liberal approach is more pragmatic in seeking realistic, measurable changes through established channels such as courts, elections, and political parties. This makes it more adaptable in modern democratic contexts.
Compatibility with Democratic Values: Liberal movements align well with democratic values such as pluralism, participation, and legal equality. They work within the system to protect and expand democratic rights and freedoms.
Global Scope: Liberal approaches have been instrumental in promoting human rights globally, especially in post-colonial societies and in movements for gender, racial, and sexual equality.

However, critics argue that the Liberal approach can sometimes be too focused on individual rights and may neglect collective needs or fail to address systemic inequalities. Additionally, this approach may be seen as too gradual, focusing on incremental change rather than radical transformation.

3. Key Differences between the Gandhian and Liberal Approaches

Feature	Gandhian Approach	Liberal Approach
Philosophical Basis	Non-violence, moral transformation	Individual rights, legal reforms
Methodology	Mass non-violent resistance, civil disobedience	Institutional reform, legal advocacy
Goal	Social and moral upliftment, unity	Protection of rights, democracy, and justice
Focus	Collective transformation and unity	Individual rights and freedoms
Tactical Approach	Non-violent resistance, self-reliance	Legal challenges, policy reforms, political participation
Institutional Engagement	Often outside established institutions	Primarily works within institutional frameworks

Conclusion

In summary, while the Gandhian approach emphasizes non-violence, moral transformation, and mass mobilization for collective change, the Liberal approach prioritizes individual rights, democratic reforms, and institutional engagement. Both approaches have been influential in shaping social movements globally, but they diverge in terms of their philosophical assumptions, methods of action, and ultimate goals. The Gandhian approach offers a spiritual and ethical vision of social change, while the Liberal approach focuses on reforming the political and legal structures that govern society. Each has its strengths and limitations, and their applicability depends on the socio-political context in which the movement operates.

IGNOUMATIC