M.N. Roy (1887–1954), a prominent Indian revolutionary and political thinker, is known for his critical approach towards Marxism, particularly as it evolved in the Soviet Union and other parts of the world. A key figure in the radical nationalist and communist movements, Roy was deeply involved in the Indian independence struggle and later became a significant proponent of scientific socialism. However, his views on Marxism underwent substantial evolution over time, particularly after his interaction with the Soviet system and his growing disillusionment with the direction of the international communist movement.
Roy’s humanist critique of Marxism was centered on his belief that Marxism had been distorted and rigidly applied in a way that ignored human freedom, individual creativity, and social progress. His critique represented a departure from the orthodox Marxist ideology and called for a more flexible, human-centered form of socialism, which he believed could offer a more effective path to achieving social justice, equality, and freedom.
Roy’s critique can be divided into several key aspects:
1. Rejection of Economic Determinism
One of the most important aspects of Roy’s critique of Marxism was his rejection of the economic determinism inherent in classical Marxist theory. According to Marxism, the economic base (the mode of production) determines the superstructure (political institutions, ideologies, culture, etc.). Marxists generally believed that economic conditions shaped the course of history, and that once the proletariat (working class) seized control of the means of production, it would usher in a classless society.
Roy, however, argued that this view was overly deterministic. He contended that the historical materialism at the core of Marxist thought reduced human beings to mere products of their material conditions, ignoring the active role of human agency and individual will in shaping history. Roy believed that human beings were not simply shaped by economic forces but were capable of actively creating their own future through conscious action and political struggle.
Roy’s humanist critique emphasized that human freedom and individual creativity should be central to any social transformation. He maintained that the focus should be on developing human potential rather than simply changing economic structures. This led him to advocate for a revised form of socialism that did not view human beings as merely economic agents but as autonomous individuals capable of shaping their destinies.
2. Criticism of the Soviet Model of Socialism
Roy was a vocal critic of the Soviet Union’s version of Marxism, which he saw as a distortion of the original ideals of Karl Marx. Initially, Roy had been an admirer of the October Revolution and the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, but over time, he became disillusioned with the authoritarian and centralized nature of the Soviet system under Joseph Stalin.
He argued that the Stalinist model represented a perversion of Marxist ideals, particularly the idea of a dictatorship of the proletariat, which he believed had degenerated into a dictatorship of the state. For Roy, this shift from a system meant to empower the working class to one that was dominated by a single-party state led to the suppression of individual freedoms, the centralization of power, and the exploitation of the very people it was meant to liberate.
Roy’s critique highlighted the totalitarian tendencies inherent in the Soviet system, where the state apparatus took on a repressive role rather than serving as an instrument of social and economic liberation. He maintained that freedom and democracy were essential to the socialist project, and that any system that suppressed individual rights and freedoms in the name of state control was contrary to true socialism.
3. Emphasis on Humanism and Individual Autonomy
Central to Roy’s critique of Marxism was his humanist approach, which placed the individual at the center of the social and political order. For Roy, the ultimate goal of any socialist movement should be the enhancement of human dignity and the liberation of individuals from all forms of oppression, whether they be social, economic, or political.
Unlike orthodox Marxists, who viewed individuals primarily in terms of their class position, Roy argued that socialism should be about empowering individuals to realize their full potential as autonomous human beings. He believed that human freedom was the ultimate goal of socialism, and that this could only be achieved through a system that respected individual rights, personal autonomy, and freedom of expression.
Roy’s humanist socialism was not just about changing the economic system but also about transforming the cultural and social fabric of society to foster individual empowerment and creative expression. For Roy, a true socialist society would be one that promoted human flourishing, not just economic equality, and provided equal opportunities for all individuals to develop their intellectual, artistic, and spiritual capacities.
4. Criticism of the Marxist View of Revolution
Roy also took issue with the Marxist conception of revolution, which was often seen as a violent overthrow of the existing order by the working class. According to Marxism, the revolution would be the means by which the working class would seize power and establish a dictatorship of the proletariat as a precursor to the eventual establishment of a classless society.
Roy, however, questioned the idea of revolution as an inevitable process. He believed that revolution could not be reduced to a mechanistic process governed by economic laws. Instead, he argued that a revolutionary movement had to be based on the active participation of individuals who were motivated by humanist ideals and a commitment to democracy and freedom.
In his view, the Marxist approach to revolution often resulted in authoritarianism rather than liberation, and he argued that peaceful, democratic means of social change should be prioritized over violent uprisings. He emphasized that the ultimate goal of revolution should be to create a just and democratic society, where individuals are free to live according to their own values and aspirations.
5. Revised Concept of Socialist Revolution
As part of his humanist critique, Roy proposed a revised concept of socialist revolution that was more in line with democracy, human rights, and individual freedom. He suggested that the socialist revolution should aim at establishing a democratic society where people had the freedom to express their ideas, elect their leaders, and shape their future through collective decision-making.
This revolution would not involve the violent overthrow of existing systems but would focus on gradual social transformation through political participation, education, and cultural change. Roy believed that socialism could only be achieved if the revolution was grounded in the values of humanism and individual liberty, not in the dogma and authoritarianism that he believed had characterized the Soviet model.
Conclusion
M.N. Roy’s humanist critique of Marxism was a call for a more flexible, democratic, and individual-centered form of socialism, one that prioritized human freedom and dignity. Roy rejected economic determinism, authoritarianism, and violent revolution, which he saw as central to traditional Marxist thought, and instead called for a socialism based on individual autonomy, democratic values, and peaceful transformation. His ideas were a significant departure from orthodox Marxism, offering an alternative vision for achieving social justice and equality through humanist principles.
Leave a Reply