St. Augustine, a Christian philosopher and theologian of the 4th and 5th centuries, made significant contributions to political thought, especially in his work The City of God. His views on the state, property, and slavery are intertwined with his Christian beliefs and his understanding of human nature, sin, and divine grace. Augustine’s political philosophy reflects a tension between his theological concerns and the realities of earthly political structures.
In contrast to earlier Greek and Roman political philosophers, Augustine emphasized the role of divine providence in human affairs and viewed earthly political institutions as inherently imperfect and transient. He viewed the state and its institutions as a necessary part of human life but subordinate to the ultimate goal of achieving salvation and eternal life with God.
The State According to St. Augustine
For Augustine, the state is a temporal and imperfect institution that exists because of human sinfulness. Augustine contrasts two cities in his most famous work, The City of God:
- The City of God: This represents the community of believers who live according to God’s will and seek eternal salvation. It is not a political entity in the earthly sense, but a spiritual city that transcends time and space, with its citizens living in anticipation of the eternal life to come.
- The City of Man: This represents the earthly state and human society, which is often marked by sin, conflict, and imperfection. The City of Man is formed by humans’ desire for worldly goods, power, and pleasure, often driven by pride and selfishness. Augustine argues that the state exists because of human sin and is therefore a necessary evil. It serves a practical purpose: to provide order and peace in a fallen world, but it is not an ideal or permanent structure.
Augustine believed that while the state is important for maintaining peace and preventing chaos, it is ultimately secondary to the spiritual goals of the Christian faith. The political order can help regulate human behavior, but it cannot provide the ultimate fulfillment that comes from living according to divine law. As such, Augustine was critical of the Roman Empire’s ambition to be a perfect political system, emphasizing that it was merely one of many temporal powers that would pass away.
Property and St. Augustine
Augustine’s views on property are deeply connected to his Christian theology. He did not see private property as inherently wrong, but he was wary of how it could be misused or abused. For Augustine, the key issue was not the existence of private property itself but the attitude towards it. In the City of God, Augustine makes it clear that private property is a part of the human condition, but it must be used in accordance with God’s commandments and the principles of charity.
He argued that material possessions should not be the focus of one’s life, but instead, people should view property as a means to serve God and others. The right use of property was to be motivated by love for one’s neighbor, and any accumulation of wealth for selfish purposes was seen as a form of greed or covetousness, which was a sin. Augustine thus critiqued the excessive desire for material wealth, which he believed could lead people away from the spiritual and moral life.
Furthermore, Augustine accepted the necessity of property rights in the context of civil society, as these rights provided order and stability. However, he placed an emphasis on moderation and generosity, seeing the proper use of property as an essential part of living a moral and Christian life.
Slavery and St. Augustine
Augustine’s views on slavery are shaped by the historical context of his time. Slavery was a widespread and accepted practice in the Roman Empire, and Augustine did not call for its immediate abolition. However, his views on slavery are complex, as they intertwine with his Christian theology and his understanding of human dignity.
- Theological Justification for Slavery: Augustine accepted slavery as part of the fallen state of humanity, recognizing that slavery was a consequence of sin and the imperfections of the earthly world. He did not argue for slavery as a divine institution, but rather as a reality of human life in a world marred by sin. In his time, slaves were often seen as being part of a natural hierarchy that existed due to the imperfections of human society.
- The Christian Duty to Treat Slaves Justly: While Augustine did not advocate for the immediate abolition of slavery, he believed that Christian rulers and masters had a duty to treat slaves with justice, compassion, and respect. For Augustine, the Christian approach to slavery emphasized moral duties. Christian masters were urged to recognize the spiritual equality of slaves in the eyes of God, and the relationship between master and slave was meant to be based on Christian charity rather than oppression.
- Slavery as a Means of Spiritual Progress: In certain writings, Augustine saw slavery as a social condition that could provide a moral opportunity for both masters and slaves to cultivate virtues such as humility, patience, and compassion. For slaves, suffering under masters might be seen as a way to develop Christian virtues and gain favor in the eyes of God.
- Gradual Social Transformation: Augustine did not call for the immediate overthrow of the institution of slavery, as he believed the pursuit of social reform was secondary to the Christian goal of salvation. However, he did think that as Christianity spread, the moral transformation of individuals and rulers would eventually lead to more humane treatment of slaves, and potentially, the eventual dissolution of slavery over time.
Criticism and Legacy of Augustine’s Views on the State, Property, and Slavery
- Conservatism in Social Reform: Augustine’s acceptance of the state, property, and slavery as they were in his time has been criticized for being overly conservative. His reluctance to advocate for direct social reform in these areas meant that his political philosophy did not provide a radical critique of the oppressive systems of his day. Modern political theorists might argue that Augustine’s approach failed to fully challenge the injustices of slavery or the economic inequalities stemming from private property.
- Justification of Slavery: Augustine’s tacit acceptance of slavery has also been a point of critique. While his Christian views emphasized moral duties, some argue that his theological justification for the existence of slavery may have reinforced the status quo and delayed efforts for its abolition. His views on slavery were far less radical than later Christian thinkers like William Wilberforce or John Wesley, who advocated for abolition based on Christian principles of equality and human dignity.
- State and Divine Providence: On the positive side, Augustine’s focus on the state as a temporary and imperfect institution helped to shape later political philosophy, particularly with respect to the relationship between church and state. His views helped lay the foundation for later ideas on secular governance and the role of religion in public life.
Conclusion
St. Augustine’s views on the state, property, and slavery are deeply intertwined with his Christian theological beliefs. His conception of the state is that of a necessary evil, existing to provide order in a world ravaged by sin, while his thoughts on property emphasize moderation and the moral use of wealth. His views on slavery reflect a Christian acceptance of its existence in his time, though he urged for just and compassionate treatment of slaves. Although his theories were more conservative in their approach to social issues, Augustine’s writings have had a lasting impact on the development of Christian political thought and the relationship between religion and politics.
Leave a Reply