Aristotle (384–322 BCE), one of the most influential philosophers of Western thought, made significant contributions to political theory, particularly in his work Politics. Aristotle’s theory of justice is central to his broader understanding of politics, ethics, and human flourishing. Unlike modern theories that focus on abstract concepts of justice, Aristotle’s views are deeply rooted in the practical realities of human life and social institutions. His theory of justice is intricately connected to his broader philosophical framework, including his concepts of virtue, the purpose of the state, and the good life.
This essay discusses Aristotle’s theory of justice, explaining its major components, and then offers a critical commentary on its implications and relevance today.
1. The Two Types of Justice: Distributive and Corrective
Aristotle distinguishes between two types of justice:
- Distributive Justice: This form of justice concerns the distribution of goods, honors, and wealth within society. Aristotle believed that justice involves giving people what they deserve according to their merit. However, the key aspect of distributive justice in Aristotle’s theory is the concept of proportionality—people should receive goods or benefits in proportion to their virtue or contribution to society.
- In an ideal state, distributive justice ensures that wealth, honor, and resources are allocated fairly, but fairness here does not mean strict equality. Rather, it means that individuals receive according to their desert—those who contribute more to the common good (whether through intellect, effort, or virtue) should receive more.
- Corrective Justice: This form of justice comes into play when there has been an unjust transaction or wrong. Corrective justice aims to restore balance in situations where one person has wronged another, either by breaking a contract, stealing, or harming someone. In corrective justice, the goal is to restore equality by balancing the loss caused by the wrong.
- Aristotle’s corrective justice is essentially about rectification—making the wrongdoer compensate the victim for their loss and ensuring the restoration of balance. This type of justice is often applied in the courts or through legal systems, where restitution is made to restore the status quo.
2. Justice as Virtue
For Aristotle, justice is not just a set of rules or a legal framework. It is a virtue, a quality of character that individuals cultivate in order to live a flourishing life. In his Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle explains that virtue lies in a balance between extremes, and this balance is what makes a person just.
- Justice as a Mean: Aristotle views justice as the mean between excess and deficiency. In terms of virtue, it is the balance between doing what is right and fair, avoiding the extremes of unjust or disproportionate behavior. In this sense, justice is a moral virtue, and a just person is someone who acts in accordance with reason, balancing their interests with the interests of others.
- For Aristotle, a just person will act according to the golden mean, maintaining a sense of balance in their actions towards others. This ethical sense of justice is rooted in individual character, meaning that to be just is a matter of developing virtues such as moderation, fairness, and honesty.
3. Justice and the State
Aristotle places significant emphasis on the relationship between justice and the state. He views the state as the institution that enables individuals to achieve their highest potential. Justice, for Aristotle, is not merely an individual moral virtue but a quality that defines the good society. The state, in his view, exists to enable citizens to live virtuous lives, and justice is the key to achieving this goal.
- The Role of the State: According to Aristotle, the state is a natural institution, formed for the purpose of promoting the common good and helping individuals achieve their telos or purpose. In his view, the political community exists to help individuals achieve virtue, and it is only through a just state that citizens can live flourishing lives.
- Aristotle’s view of the state is closely linked to his theory of the best life, which is a life of rationality and virtue. The role of the state is to create conditions that allow individuals to cultivate these virtues, and thus achieve the good life. This means that justice, as a virtue, is central to the proper functioning of the state.
4. Justice and Equality
Aristotle’s approach to justice differs significantly from contemporary theories of equality. For modern thinkers, especially egalitarians, justice often involves a call for equal treatment for all individuals, irrespective of their differences. However, Aristotle does not advocate for equality in the strict sense.
- Proportional Equality: Aristotle’s distributive justice is based on proportionality, not equality. He argues that people should not be treated equally in all matters because not all people are equal. Instead, individuals should receive what they deserve, based on their merit or role in society.
- In his view, social inequalities are acceptable as long as they are proportional to individuals’ contributions to the common good. For instance, a highly skilled craftsman should be compensated more than a laborer, because their contribution to society is more valuable. Similarly, in political life, rulers may be more educated and virtuous than the ruled and thus deserve more political power. This view reflects Aristotle’s hierarchical vision of society.
5. Critical Commentary on Aristotle’s Theory of Justice
Aristotle’s theory of justice has been highly influential in the development of Western political philosophy, but it has also faced criticism, particularly in the context of contemporary ideals of democracy and equality.
a. Criticism of Proportionality
One major criticism of Aristotle’s proportional justice is its potential to justify inequality. By asserting that individuals should receive what they deserve according to their contributions or virtues, Aristotle’s theory has been seen as an endorsement of hierarchical social structures. This has led to a justification for inequality based on perceived differences in merit or status, which many contemporary political theorists find troubling.
b. Exclusion of Women and Slaves
Aristotle’s political philosophy is often criticized for its exclusion of women and slaves from the political community. He believed that women were naturally inferior to men, and that slaves were property rather than citizens. His conception of justice does not extend to these groups, a perspective that has been widely rejected in modern democratic thought.
c. Static Conception of Society
Another criticism is that Aristotle’s model is static, grounded in a fixed vision of human nature and society. His idea that society is naturally hierarchical and that some people are inherently more virtuous or deserving of power than others contradicts more dynamic views of social change, where people can rise based on merit rather than being confined to their birth status.
Conclusion
Aristotle’s theory of justice offers a sophisticated and nuanced approach to political philosophy. His emphasis on distributive and corrective justice, and his view of justice as a virtue that shapes individual character, highlight his belief that justice is integral to human flourishing. However, his support for proportional equality and his exclusion of certain groups from the political community remain problematic when viewed through the lens of modern democratic values. Despite these limitations, Aristotle’s ideas continue to be a foundational part of political theory and provide valuable insights into the relationship between morality, law, and politics.
Leave a Reply