Skip to content

IGNOUMATIC

Menu
  • About
  • Account
  • Contact US
  • Database and Archive
  • Disclaimer
  • Login
  • Logout
  • Members
  • My account
  • Password Reset
  • Privacy Policy
  • Register
  • User
  • Terms of Use
Menu

What did Gramsci mean by hegemony ? In what way did he modify the orthodox Marxian position?

Posted on July 20, 2024 by Dr. IGNOUMATIC

Antonio Gramsci, an Italian Marxist theorist and political activist, introduced the concept of hegemony as a key component of his analysis of power, culture, and social change. Gramsci’s understanding of hegemony represents a departure from the orthodox Marxist position, as he sought to expand and deepen Marx’s analysis of class struggle and revolution in the context of capitalist societies. To understand Gramsci’s concept of hegemony and its modifications to orthodox Marxism, let’s delve into its meaning and implications:

1. Hegemony Defined:

   Hegemony, as Gramsci conceptualized it, refers to the dominance or leadership exercised by a ruling class or social group over subordinate classes through a combination of coercion and consent. Unlike traditional notions of power that focus solely on coercion and force, Gramsci’s notion of hegemony highlights the role of cultural, ideological, and institutional factors in maintaining the stability and legitimacy of capitalist societies.

   Gramsci argues that ruling classes establish and maintain their hegemony by securing the consent and loyalty of subordinate groups through the dissemination of dominant ideologies, values, norms, and beliefs that reinforce the existing social order. This process of cultural and ideological hegemony serves to naturalize and legitimize the interests of the ruling class, obscuring the underlying power relations and reproducing social inequalities.

2. Modification of Orthodox Marxism:

   Gramsci’s concept of hegemony represents a significant departure from the orthodox Marxist position in several key respects:

   a. Role of Culture and Ideology:

      Gramsci expanded Marx’s analysis of economic structures and class relations to include the role of culture and ideology in shaping social consciousness and behavior. While orthodox Marxism emphasized the primacy of economic factors in determining social relations, Gramsci recognized the importance of cultural and ideological hegemony in perpetuating capitalist domination.

   b. State and Civil Society:

      Gramsci introduced the distinction between the state and civil society to analyze the complex terrain of power relations in capitalist societies. While the state represents the coercive apparatus of ruling class domination, civil society encompasses a broader array of institutions, including schools, churches, media, and cultural organizations, through which hegemony is exercised. Gramsci’s focus on civil society highlights the multifaceted nature of power and the ways in which ruling classes maintain control through ideological means.

   c. Historical Bloc and Organic Intellectuals:

      Gramsci introduced the concept of the historical bloc to describe the coalition of social forces and alliances that support and sustain a particular hegemonic order. This concept emphasizes the importance of understanding the complex interactions between different social groups and classes in shaping political alliances and collective identities. Additionally, Gramsci emphasized the role of organic intellectuals, who emerge from within subordinate classes and challenge ruling-class hegemony through counter-hegemonic struggles and cultural production.

   d. War of Position and War of Maneuver:

      Gramsci distinguished between the “war of position” and the “war of maneuver” as two strategies for revolutionary change within capitalist societies. The war of position involves a long-term process of building counter-hegemonic alliances, challenging dominant ideologies, and contesting ruling-class power through cultural and ideological struggle. In contrast, the war of maneuver refers to more direct confrontations and revolutionary upheavals aimed at seizing state power. Gramsci’s emphasis on the war of position reflects his recognition of the need for sustained organizing and mobilizing efforts to challenge hegemonic power structures.

In summary, Gramsci’s concept of hegemony represents a significant departure from orthodox Marxism by expanding the analysis of power to include cultural, ideological, and institutional dimensions. By highlighting the role of consent, culture, and civil society in maintaining capitalist domination, Gramsci deepened our understanding of class struggle and revolution in modern societies. His modifications to the orthodox Marxist position emphasize the importance of cultural hegemony, political alliances, and strategic struggle in the pursuit of social transformation and revolutionary change.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X

Like this:

Like Loading...

Post navigation

← Explain different types of duties and their relations with rights.
Critically assess the Welfare State Theory. →

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

Archive

  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • March 2024

Categories

  • biodiversity
  • culture
  • democracy
  • economy
  • European Union
  • ignou
  • india
  • International Relations
  • nature
  • news
  • political-philosophy
  • political-science
  • sustainability
  • Uncategorized
  • UPSC

Tags

agriculture ai business china climate climate-change conservation diversity ethics farming feminism feminist finance freedom gandhi health history ignou india KNOWLEDGE liberty mahatma-gandhi marxism nationalism nonviolence philosophy political-philosophy political-science political-theory politics poverty PSC religion renewable-energy russia socialism sociology sustainability sustainable-agriculture sustainable-living technology terrorism travel UPSC women

© 2025 IGNOUMATIC | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme
%d